1

Act of Love

The Liturgy – Much More than

a form of Words

The Christian liturgy is not a form of words. It is an action of the community.  What kind of an action? Which community?

Action de Grace

The French expression action de grace is translated into English as thanksgiving. This latter word, if you are an Indian, means a boring speech at the end of a meeting thanking all and sundry, or if you are an American a sumptious Turkey dinner in November commemorating a historic event constitutive of the nation. It is true that the Eucharistic liturgy has both these elements, a speech offering thanks to God and a commemorative meal.

Perhaps the least helpful way of understanding the Eucharist or Holy Communion is to regard it as a ‘sacrament’, a means of grace. If we focus on what we get out of the Eucharist, we have already missed more than half the point.

The Eucharist is fundamentally a response of love and gratitude, not a means of getting something free called grace from God. It is the response of the Creation to its Creator. It is an expression of gratitude on the part of the Creator both for having brought it into being from non-being, and for redeeming it in Christ, when it had moved away from being to non-being again by its own wilful choice.

But the liturgy is more than an expression of thanks in words. We can offer thanks to God for creation and redemption without the Eucharist, in ordinary prayer. The Eucharist is not a mere prayer. It is an act of self-offering in love, wherein words can serve a function; but it should be clear that mere words cannot constitute an act of love.

There has to be total, loving, adoring, self-surrender in the act of self-offering. The Eucharist is Agape (love), and the two are inseparable. It is a response of love to God who is love, who made us out of nothing, and who gave his only-begotten Son that we may not perish. The forms of words, unless it expresses this loving response, becomes a mere noisy gong and a clanging cymbal.

Action of the Community

The community that makes this act of love has three dimensions. It is not just a few local people gathered together in a building who offer the Eucharist. It is offered, in every instance, by the whole body of Christ, and not just by the fragment of the Church which is the local group of Christians of one or more denominations. The local Church is the whole Church in its local manifestation. And so in each local Church, it is the whole Church in heaven and earth, i.e. in all time and space, that offers the Eucharist. The commemoration of the departed and of the saints of the Church is not an optional matter in the Eucharist. It is they with us and we with them that lift up the offering, and we have to be aware of each other in the body of Christ.

Second, the Eucharist is offered on behalf of all mankind, and not just Christians. Even those who are not united to Christ by faith and baptism are linked to him by the fact of the Incarnation. It is human nature that Christ assumed, not Christian nature. The whole of humanity is now linked to the Incarnate Christ, whether they recognize it or not. True, there are fundamental distinctions to be made between the relationship to Christ of Christians by faith and baptism, and of all mankind to Christ in spite of themselves. But both relationships exist, and we as Christians and human beings share in both. Our fundamental solidarity with all mankind has to find expression in the liturgy, particularly in the prayers of intercession and in the offertory prayer.

The whole Church, the whole Mankind, and the whole Creation _ the three realms in which we as created Christian human beings participate, have all three to be lifted up to God in the Eucharist, along with Christ’s self-offering on the Cross. This third aspect has become doubly important in our time when the enviornment crisis has begun to explode. It is the fruit of the earth, wheat and wine, that we offer up to God. With the elements the whole of material and organic creation is lifted up to God. Man, Christian humanity in Christ, thus becomes the spokesman, the utterance - giver, the highpriest, of Creation as a whole. The Eucharist is the response of the Creation as God’s other, to her Lord. Mankind, and the Church are units within the creation where the Creation has developed greater consciousness and deeper awareness.

Christians do not offer the Eucharist in order to get something out of it. The Church in Christ offers the Eucharist as the mouth-piece and High Priest of Creation. This offering is a response to the act of love which created the universe and redeemed it. Like all acts of true love, it is not instrumental to something else, but a manifestation of the highest reality called love, which when made a means for something else, becomes degraded. When we offer ourselves, the whole mankind, and the whole creation, God again gives Himself to us in that continuing act of love called the Communion. His Body and Blood, God’s own body, becomes united with ours, and through us with the whole mankind and the whole of Creation.

 A true Eucharistic liturgy is the highest art of God and Man, not for some other purpose, but as an expression of the true being of the Creator and the Creation. The offering is made to the Holy Trinity. But one of the Holy Trinity, Christ is both the offerer and the offering, for he has by Incarnation identified himself with the Creation, and offered it once for all in his own body on the Cross. The Holy Spirit is the one who unites us to Christ and makes our sacrifice his. The Holy Spirit also opens the way into the Presence. The Holy Spirit cleanses, sanctifies, removes barriers, and makes the love - offering possible. The Eucharist is thus an act of and in the Holy Trinity, into which we are caught up by grace.

2

WHAT IS PRAYER?

WHY PRAY? HOW PRAY?

What is Prayer?

Prayer is like breathing. Without breathing we cannot live. When we breathe, air enters our lungs, cleanses the blood in our veins by relieving it of the carbon dioxide, and supplying it with oxygen. If I do not breathe for a few minutes I die. When I have hard physical work to do, I need more air than when I am sleeping or sitting in a chair.

Fortunately God has so ordained that we do not die spiritually just because we have failed to pray for sometime. But where there is no prayer sin accumulates and the proper functioning of the spiritual life becomes obstructed. And if you have important spiritual work to do you need more prayer than otherwise. Only those who pray constantly are exercising their spiritual muscles.

Prayer is communion or communication with God -opening ourselves to Him and receiving His love. It is by living consciously in this relationship of love that we can be transformed into the image of God. By prayer we become more like God, more loving, more wise, more powerful, more kind and good.

In prayer we are cleansed of the accumulated impurities of our life and we are supplied with power to live a good, kind and holy life.

Prayer is not a matter of asking God for all kinds of things. Some teen-agers speak to their earthly father only when they need money. We should not become like them in relation to our heavenly Father - going to Him only when we need something. The relationship is valuable in itself, as in all true love. It is not what we get out of it that matters, but the fact that we are in communion with our loving Heavenly Father.

Why Pray?

Does not God know what we need, even before we ask him? Why does He want us to ask? Does prayer change God’s will in any way? Can my prayer change the future that God has already determined?

These are legitimate questions that need to be answered. The Bible says clearly ‘your Father knows what you need before you ask Him’ (St. Mathew 6:8). But God wants that we know what is good for others as well as for ourselves. God wants that our will should not incline towards evil, but desire the good with deep yearning. Prayer is therefore a way of training the will to desire the good, as well as of turning our wills towards the highest concentration of all good, namely God.

Prayer is thus a way of becoming good by using our freedom to turn towards the good and to will the good. By prayer we become like God. God is good and wills the good. We should also become like God in willing and desiring what is good. By communion with God we also learn to desire the good which God also desires.

God said: ‘Let there be light’ and there was light. And God saw that the light was good (Gen. 1:3-4). What God willed became reality. We are to become like God. So we must also acquire the capacity to will the good, and it will happen as we desire, when we become more and more like God. Prayer is an expression of our will in desiring the good and realising it. When we are delivered from selfishness, pride, and evil desires, our prayers will become more like the creative Word of God, which merely by saying ‘let there be light’ can create light.

God has made us partakers of His own divine nature. He has called us to share in God’s own glory and excellence (2 Pet. 1:4). When we trust in God and live a life of discipline, prayer, worship, virtue, knowledge, godliness, brotherly affection and love (2 Pet. 1:5-8), we are transformed into God’s likeness and share in His divine power. God wants us to have a part in the task of shaping this world through prayer and knowledge and work.

By prayer we do change reality. God has given us that power. But this power is not available to us until we become more godlike. That is why the prayers of the saints are more effective than our own prayer - because they are more god like than we are. If the power to change the world by our will is in the hands of evil men, they will make the world evil. We have to grow in the capacity for prayer by developing the habits of prayer and loving service.

And our prayers should not be selfish. In prayer the first focus is God. The second focus is other people. Only in the third place should we ask things for ourselves. In the Lord’s Prayer all the first petitions are focused on God - His name, His kingdom, His will. This is the way our prayer should also be. We pray that God’s purposes may be established in the lives of all people, that evil may be banished from the earth, that all men may live together in peace and justice, praising God the centre and source of all good. Even in the prayers that ask for daily food, for forgiveness and for protection from evil, the first person singular (I, me) is not used in the Lord’s Prayer. We ask  things for us, for all men.

When we all pray with love and faith, without selfishness or pride, our prayer changes things. God has more laws than the laws of physical science. He can make prayer achieve ‘miracles’ of healing and transformation which cannot be explained by medical science. Our science knows only some of God’s laws. Prayer is also subject to certain laws. It is the same power of God which operates in the scientific realm, and in the realm of prayer.

In prayer, we are never alone. Not even alone with God. Especially in group prayer, we commemorate all those who are members of the Body of Christ, for it is as a member of the Body that we pray, and the other members are always with us. This is why we commemorate the Prophets, Apostles, the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Martyrs, the Saints, the great Teachers and all the faithful departed and all the faithful living.

How Pray?

Prayer has to be learned. It is like swimming. When you are first thrown into the water, you may sink. You then may think that the law of gravity is final and cannot be changed. But there are other laws, like those of buoyancy and motion. The mere knowledge of these laws cannot teach you to swim. One jumps in and slowly, by repeated practice, acquires the skills of remaining afloat and of moving on the surface of or under the water. And some people are more skillful swimmers than others, because they have learned the rules and acquired the skills by constant practice.

The first rule in prayer as in swimming, is not to give up just because you do not succeed in the first three or four attempts. Prayer is a spiritual skill to be acquired by constant practice.

The second rule, again as in swimming is to ‘let go’, to let the water support you, to be unanxious and relaxed. In prayer also we have to let ourselves go, relax, trust in God to support you and teach you how to pray.

The third rule is to keep up the practice, even if you do not feel like it, or enjoy it. In the life of prayer, our inherent love of sensual pleasures and our selfish love of laziness and comfort, will interfere to make us reluctant to keep up the practice, finding various excuses for not praying. There is no use saying ‘I don’t feel like praying’ or  ‘I do not get anything from it.’ It will take years before you get the habit of prayer and really begin to enjoy it. One must strengthen the will to have control over the laziness of the body and the desires of the flesh if one is to make progress in the art and skill of prayer. There is nothing like regular practice which can teach you to pray.

A fourth rule, closely connected with the third, is: develop the discipline of prayer through fasting and self-control. Man does not become free and good like God until he learns to control his own inner drives and passions. Restraint of hunger and thirst, of anger and jealousy, of sexual passion, of the desire for glory and flattery, of the desire for bodily excitement and for sensual stimulation, and of all inner turbulences which make us do things against our own free will, is a necessary preparation for prayer. As good athletes competing for the Olympic Games go through very rigorous self discipline in order to keep their body, muscles and nerves in good condition, so should the man of prayer keep his body, mind and spirit and good condition and under conscious control.

A fifth rule is to use our whole body and even material things in the service of prayer. Prayer is an act of the whole man, body, soul and spirit - not simply an act of the mind. The body can participate in prayer through posture, speech, and acts:

Posture - In our Eastern tradition, the posture for prayer is standing, facing east, with arms uplifted or folded in adoration and worship.

Focus - It is good to have a focal point outside - a cross with two candles on each side, icons or pictures of Christ, of the Blessed Virgin Mother and of the Saints, or even a more elaborate prayer - altar fixed in some part of the house, where the whole family assembles for prayer. Crucifixes, i.e. crosses with the representation of the crucified body of Christ on it, belong to the Western tradition and are not to be encouraged in our tradition. In choosing pictures, it is best to use eastern icons. Pictures with the sacred heart of Christ or of the Virgin Mother are to be avoided, because these belong to a particular period in Latin piety and are not helpful for a balanced spirituality.

Lips and Mouth - The body must pray - not merely the mind. Let your lips and mouth sing the praises of God, even if your mind does not always follow. The act of the lips and mouth is also your act of prayer, even without the concentration. Singing is better than saying your prayers, for in the very music certain human attitudes and aspirations are expressed.

Wandering of the mind - Do not get anxious about the wandering of your mind. When you become aware that your mind is wandering, bring it back by consciously offering your wandering mind also to God. It is part of our confession about ourselves. “This  is what I am Lord, distracted and unable to concentrate. I offer myself to Thee as I am. Take my wandering and distracted mind, and heal it by Thy grace.” God will forgive you and transform you gradually.

Gestures - Use the gestures of prostration, bowing the head, making the sign of the cross, and giving the kiss of peace. Words are not the only means of expression we have. Folding the hands and bowing is a sign of adoration, and of waiting for a blessing. Lifting up your hands with palms open, can mean petition, penitence, and intercession. Prostration is like Sashtangapranama, the sign of complete surrender and submission, placing yourselves in the hands of God with full trust. Making the sign of the cross is a way of reminding ourselves that we have been saved by the Cross of Christ, in fact crucified with Christ. Keep your three fingers together (thumb, index and middle fingers) to touch the forehead (symbolizing the Trinity, the source of all life and all good) and make a descending motion to the lower side of your chest to signify the descent of the Son of God from heaven to earth for our salvation, then take your fingers from your left arm to your right arm signifying both the horizontal arm of the cross, and the fact that we who were on the left as children of darkness, have now been brought to the right side of God as children of light. Giving the kiss of peace is the symbol of mutual forgiveness and love, and it is a time for us to overcome all feelings of bitterness or anger against members of the family or others outside.

All these signs are part of a language, which goes much deeper than words and transforms our sub-conscious minds which words can seldom reach.

A sixth rule is to keep the balance between group prayer and personal prayer. Man is not primarily an individual. It is as a member of the Body of Christ that he has any standing before God. Therefore it is important for us to come into the presence of God regularly as a community - as a family, as a youth group, as a local congregation. And a community is composed of all kinds of people, not all of them exactly like you. They have different tastes, different ways of praying, different habits of prayer. I have to join them even sometimes when I think that their way of worship is not what it should be. Without participating in community worship and making the necessary adjustments necessary for joining them, we cannot get rid of our selfishness and pride, and grow to be a real human being.

But community worship is not enough by itself. We need various levels of community with varying degrees of intensity of relationship. The youth group and the family are more intimate communities than the congregation. New forms can be used in these smaller groups which will be difficult or unfamiliar for the congregation as a whole. The prayers in this book are mainly meant for family and group worship, but can also be used for personal prayer in the privacy of your own room at home or in the hostel.

In addition to these forms, however, some other forms of prayer should be mastered for personal use. The most effective and useful of these forms is called ejaculatory prayer. These are one - sentence prayers which one can repeat as many times as necessary, no matter, where or when. You can say them in your mind when you are waiting for a bus; when you are anxious about something; when you are facing temptation, when you feel bored and lonely, while you are lying in bed, comfortable and too lazy to get up; while going to bed and when sleep does not come immediately, and so on.

The following are some of the possible forms of ejaculatory prayer:

1. Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, be merciful to me a sinner.

2. O God, Thou art my God. I love Thee. I am Thine for ever.

3. Lord, you are my Master and Lord, I give myself to Thee.

4. Lord, keep me in Thy ways, keep me from all evil.

5. Lord, have mercy, Lord, have mercy, Lord have mercy upon me.

You can make up your own forms of prayer, for here the Church lays down no rules for personal prayers. Of these forms above, the first was a favourite with the monks, and is known as the ‘Jesus Prayer.’’ They used to recite it thousands of times in a day as a sort of Mantra. In Mount Athos, the monks trained themselves to say this prayer along with every breath. They would say “Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God” with every inhaling breath, hold the breath in the lungs for a few seconds and then exhale, saying “be merciful to me a sinner.” The idea was that the prayer should become as incessant an action as breathing, that the Lord Jesus Christ should become established in your heart as a deity is in a temple, and that you should constantly be in an attitude of prayer and repentance.

These forms of personal prayer as well as others should be developed. Each child of God has a right to speak to God any time and at all times, using his or her own words. There are no Church rules for personal prayer. It is an act of your personal freedom, and therefore is all the more pleasing to God when you use your own personal intimate language. Personal prayer enriches group prayer; common prayer in the family, group or congregation enriches one’s personal prayer; neither should be neglected. The two should balance each other. But the use of extemporary prayer is not to be encouraged in group worship.

A seventh rule is that prayer should be nourished by the reading of the scriptures and meditation. One can discipline oneself to read a chapter of scripture every day.

Read aloud or silently. Meditate on the meaning of the passage. Devotional books may be helpful, but may also obscure the meaning of the scripture. Do not worry about whether the reading of scriptures gives you a feeling of devotion or not. Feelings are deceptive. What you need to find out is the answer to the following questions: “What was God saying to the people of that time through this passage? What does God say to me now?”

Systematic reading of the scriptures and memorizing some passages which touch you deeply will be found very helpful as life advances. You will be grateful to God in your middle age that you started reading and memorizing when your mind was still impressionable.

Conclusion

All these rules are to help you to become a praying Christian. Only your own sustained and disciplined practice will make you perfect. But remember one thing. Prayer can never be isolated from the common worship of the Eucharist and from the continuous, active compassionate love for your fellowmen. Let us all pray: “Lord, Teach us to pray. Amen.”

3

BIBLE AND LITURGY

Some definitions of the term Liturgy

(1) “Liturgy can be defined as the public and official service of worship that the Christian Church renders to God.”

F. Cabrol in Dictionnaire de Theologie Catholique

(2) “Liturgy comprises the whole group of symbols, chants and actions by means of which the Church expresses and manifests her religion towards God.”

Dom Gueranger in Institutions Liturgiques, Tome 1, p.1.

(3) Adrian Fortescue in Catholic Encyclopaedia distinguishes between the western use of the term to mean “the whole complex of official services, all the rites, ceremonies, prayers and sacraments of the Church, as opposed to private devotions”, and the Eastern use of it to mean only the Eucharistic Service.

Etymology. Greek leitourgia translates Hebrew ‘abodah’ in the LXX. Leitos comes from archaic Greek Leos = people, and erqo = to do, to work.

In Old Testament, abodah can mean the temple service of God, public service, or even slavery.

In New Testament leitourgia means temple service (Zachariah, Lk. 1:23, Heb. 9:21), the giving of aid to the Christians in Jerusalem (II Cor. 9:12), the possible martyrdom of St. Paul (Phil. 2:17), the service of assistance rendered by the Philippians to St. Paul (Phil. 2:30), the permanent priestly ministry of Christ (Heb. 8:2, 8:6). The angels are leitourgikoi or public servants (Heb. 1:14). Government officials are leitourgoi (Romans 13:6). Paul is a public servant of Christ for the Gentiles (Rom. 15:16).

Liturgical Influences in the Formation of the Scriptures

(a) In the cases of the Old and the New Testaments, leitourgia in the sense of the public worship of God, precedes the writing down of the Scriptures.

(b) A good deal of the materials in the Old and New Testaments had a liturgical provenance before they were reduced to writing.

(c) certain liturgical formulae can now be found embedded in the scriptural text.

(d) The New Testament has a significant amount of Old Testament sacramental symbolism.

(e) The liturgical practices of the Church, especially in regard to Baptism and the Eucharist are reflected in the New Testament, and have profoundly influenced the form and content of the latter.

Scripture in the formation of the liturgies of the Church

(a) Does the liturgical practice of the Church need in each case to be expressly authorized by the Scriptures?

(b) The place of the reading of the Scriptures within all services of the Church.

(c) Some examples of the scriptural language and thought - structure the prayers of the Church.

Mystery, Revelation and Apostolate or Liturgy, Scriptures and Mission

The unfortunate heritage of opposition between the Bible and Liturgy has a hoary ancestry. Tension between the cultic and the kerygmatic, the priestly and the prophetic, occurs in all religions. The danger is always too easily to resolve the tension in favour of the one and against the other. A study of the Bible itself is the best corrective to this false opposition.

4

Church Calendar And Festivals

 

The Western Calendar and the Eastern Calendar

The Origin of the Difference

Julian Calendar, established by Roman Emperor Julius Caesar in 46 BC was the calendar followed by church as well as state till the 16th century. This is still followed by most of the Eastern Orthodox churches. The western Church follows the Gregorian Calendar proclaimed by Roman Pope Gregory in 1582. Nearly all governments in the world have accepted the Gregorian Calendar. The Soviet Union accepted it in 1918. Till then it followed the Julian Calendar.

The Gregorian Calendar is more accurate. Sosigenes, the Egyptian (Alexandrian) Astronomer who formulated the Julian Calendar for Julius Caesar took it that the year (time taken by the earth to complete the orbit around the Sun) was 365 days and 6 hours. In fact, it takes only 365 days, 5 hours, 48 minutes and 46 seconds. The difference is 11 minutes and 14 seconds per year. Julian calculation = 365. 25 days, present precise calculation = 365.242199 days. The error is thus exactly 0.007801 days per year. This error adds up through the centuries. In one century, the difference adds up to 0.7801 days, and in four hundred years it is 3.1204 days. In 1000 years it becomes 7.801. In 2000 years it should 15.6 days. But due to certain later reforms in both the calendars, the actual difference in our century is only 13 days. In the Gregorian Calendar, 1700, 1800 and 1900 are not leap years, though they are divisible by four. The difference of 3 days in 400 years is adjusted by this arrangement.

This means that December 25th, Christmas day in the Julian Calendar, becomes January 7th in the Gregorian Calendar. That is why even today Christmas in Russia and so on is on January 7th. Epiphany (January 6th) becomes January 19th. And so on for all fixed festivals. The Orthodox Churches should accept the Gregorian Calendar because it is more accurate. But most of the Eastern churches refuse to do so, mostly because of an old prejudice against accepting a decision made by the Roman Pope.

Fixed Feasts and Moveable Feasts

Our Calendar is luni-solar or soli-lunar. This means we calculate the year by the sun and the month by the moon. But it is difficult to fit the phases of the moon (new moon to new moon = about 29.5 days) into the 365.25 days of the year.

In the Church there are two cycles of feasts: fixed and moveable. They usually devolve around the dates of Christ’s birth (Christmas), and the date of Easter or the crucifixion and resurrection of Christ. Christmas, since the 4th century is a fixed feast in the solar calendar, i.e. December 25th. The date of Easter is fixed according to the moon: the formula approved by the Council of Nicea (325 AD) is “first Sunday after the first full moon after the Vernal or spring equinox.” The Vernal Equinox is taken as March 21. So the date of Easter can fluctuate between March 22nd and April 25th.

The Eastern churches use the Julian Calendar to calculate the Spring equinox, which for them now falls 13 days later, i.e. on April 4th. This means in some years Easter falls on the same day for East and West, and in other years there is a difference of one to five weeks in the Eastern and Western dates of Easter.

Main Fixed Feasts

Since the 7th century, the fixed feasts turn around Christmas day-December 25th. If Christ was born on that date (there is no evidence that this is so), then the Annunciation by the Angel Gabriel to Mary the Mother of Christ, by which she received the Son of God in her womb, would be nine months before the birth, i.e. March 25th (13 days later, for the Juliansists). Since that is the date for the beginning of the Incarnation. March 25th was the New Year for some centuries.

Let us make a quick list of the main fixed feasts, as of now:

January 1st - present New Year, the circumcision of Christ (8 days after birth), and also the Feast of St. Basil.

January 6th - (19th for Julian) - Epiphany or the Baptism of Christ - very ancient festival.

February 2nd - The Presentation of the Infant Christ in the Jerusalem Temple, 40th day after birth.

March 25th - Annunciation.

August 6 - Feast of the Transfiguration.

Besides these a large number of other fixed feasts have been added to the Calendar. e.g.

August 15 - The Feast of the Assumption of Virgin Mary.

September 14 - Invention (Discovery) of the Cross of Jesus.

Then there are the feasts of the Apostles, Martyrs and Saints, which vary from church to church: e.g.

June 29 - The Apostles Peter and Paul.

June 30 - Feast of the Twelve Apostles.

July 3 - Feast of St. Thomas, and so on.

The Moveable Feasts

Moveable feasts depend on the date of Easter - e.g.

7 days before Easter - Palm Sunday.

2 days before Easter - Good Friday.

40 days after Easter - The Ascension of Christ.

50 days after Easter - Pentecost.

5

A Brief History of Choral Music

The Choir or chorus as such, seems to be of Greek origin. We do not find anything parallel to it in early Chinese, Japanese or Indian cultures.

The original Greek word, Choros (pronounced Khorose) meant actually “group dance accompanied by music.” The primary meaning of the word has more to do with dancing rather than singing. But it was not solo dancing, which often dominates our own Kathak, Kathakali, Bharatanatyam, Odissi and other dance recitals.

It was usually a Choros kuklios or a circular group, dancing rhythmically in slow or frenzied procession around the altar of a Greek god, like, for example, the altar of Dionysos or Bacchos at Athens.

Dionysos or Bacchos is the god, not only of wine, but also of dance and frenzy. The cult of Dionysos or Bacchos probably goes back to the pre history of Thrace, from where it came to Athens, Delphin and other places of worship. There is little doubt that this cult among the Greeks was the matrix of choral dancing and singing.

But it was an orgiastic cult, a wild and frenzied dance, very popular with women. Many Greek princces feared this cult, not only because of the sexual license it encouraged, but also because women possessed by Bacchos could become really wild, mad, destructive and murderous. This is reflected in Euripides’ (ca 484 - 407 BC) plays: e.g. Iphigenia at Aulis or Bacchae. Of course his younger contemporary Aristophanes (ca 445 - ca 380 BC) accused Euripides of being a woman - hater, which to him is the reason why he depicted women as wild and destructive.

In any case the Bacchanalian festivals were characterized by drunken and not always very refused, revelry. The choral dance around the altar of Dionysos was called the dithyramb, a lofty metric rythm with high - flown language. The dithyramb was created to celebrate the birth of Dionysus, but because the basis of all Greek poetry. It is a choral dance music and lends itself to slow, ritual movements, with or without frenzy.

In most Greek plays (drama) the choros represents the people and ads as their mouth piece: their lines are people’s comments and questions on the justice or injustice of the happenings of history. The Choir does not itself narrate the events, but only make occasional comments. In our Indian tradition the musical group does the whole narration while the dancer acts it out. In the Greek tradition the choir does not narrate, but only make occasional comments.

In ancient Greece choirs were maintained by the ruler at public expense or financed by a rich sponsor, who is called a Choregos. The producer of the play is usually the playwright himself who is a poet. He composes his text and then applies to the ruler for a choir. If he gets a choir, he trains them and actually puts the play (in verse) on stage. The playwright thus was called a “Choro- didaskalos” or Choir - trainer. And if a play is successful, the choir gets the longest applause, as the architects of the play.

The number of persons to take part in the choir was fixed by tradition -15 persons for tragedies, 24 for comedy and an unspecified number for satyrical plays.

The members of the Greek choirs were usually young unmarried persons or boys and they were educated people. In fact in classical antiquity the three main branches of education were music, grammar and gymnastics.

But our present form of the choir is of Christian than of pre - Christian origin. The choir as a separate group within a congregation developed mostly in the Latin and Greek churches, while the Asian African churches to this day practice congregational rather than choral singing.

In the Byzantine Greek tradition, since the 18th century, the choir has virtually taken over from the congregation the chanting of hymns and responses originally sung or said by the congregation as a whole. This was partly the consequence of the development of more complex music and more complex notation systems known only to people with training in music.

Precisely measured music and musical notation systems are comparatively late developments in western history, beginning only around the 14th century. As the churches grew rich, due to the flow of wealth into Europe through trade and piracy both church architecture and church music become more and more elaborate and ornate.

In Asia on the other hand there were quite different traditions, with considerable antiquity. The No plays of Japan as well as their less formal Kabuki theatre uses choral music as narrative. The Chinese have their Ching - hsi (Beijing opera) and the all female Yueh ch u or (musical play) and the Manchurian Ping - hsi (operetta) which are less choir - based and more like western operas and musicals in form. In Indian drama the choir usually sings but does not act.

In the west, by the 19th century they began developing huge choirs for popular festivals. The Handels festivals of the 19th century western Europe had choirs with hundreds of participants, while the “Berlioz concert monstres’’ in Paris were real monsters with thousands of participants.

Part singing as well as precise music notation developed from the need to get maximum co-ordination and variety from these huge choirs. Medieval European choirs did only unison singing of plain chant - often “a capella” or without the accompaniment of musical instruments. Their music notation system was also not very precise.

Choirs have played a very large role in the building up of unity and harmony in a community.

6

East Syrian Worship

Historical

The East Syrian Church (known to many as the Nestorian or Chaldean Church) is the Syrian Church of Antioch as it developed east of the frontiers of the Roman - Byzantine empire. Its centre was Nisibis. But its distinctiveness as a tradition could be dated from the Synod of Beth Lapat in AD 484, when this church recognized Theodore of Mopsuestia as its official teacher. i.e. his teachings were to be the standard by which the faith of other churches was to be tested. During the seventh and later centuries this church spread to Lurkestan (now in the Central Asian republics of the USSR) with bishops in Samarkand, Tashkent, Karakoram and also in Tibet as well as in China and India. Today this Church, except a part now in the Roman Catholic communion, is limited to small pockets in USA, Iraq, Iran and India.

Liturgical Books

The main eucharistic liturgies are three, which go by the names of (a) Addai and Mari, (b) Theodore of Mopsuestia and (c) Nestorius. In addition to various lectionaries (one for the gospels, a second for the apostle Paul and the qarvana which contains the first two lessons for the liturgical office, from the OT and the Acts), they have the turgame, which are homilies on the lessons in the form of hymns to be chanted with the aid of the psalter (Dawida), consecration of an altar (without chrism), prayers for ferial days, ........ of marriage, the ordination manual, etc. The offices are chanted with the aid of the psalter (Dawida), the hudra, which contains the propers of the office, antiphons, hymns and prayers, the gazza, which contains the offices for the feasts of our Lord and the saints (except those that fall on Sundays), and other books for the choirs.

The eucharistic liturgy

What has astonished many liturgists about the liturgy of Addai and Mari is the absence of the words of institution; this is not unusual in the West Syrian* tradition either (The two other Chaldean anaphorae* do have the words of institution). This is shocking only to those who believe that the recital of the words of institution effect the consecration. There is a form of the Liturgy of the Presanctified (see Presanctified Mass) for use on Good Friday.

The Liturgy of the Catechumens begins with the Trisagion*, which is followed by the lections: One from the OT, and a second from either the OT or the Acts of the Apostles. These are supposed to be read from the bema, the raised platform in the centre of the church. After the first two lections, as the priest leaves the bema to ascend the altar, the turgama or the homiletic hymn for the day is sung, interpreting the main point of the lection from the Pauline epistles which follows it. The turgama of the gospel comes next, followed by the gospel itself.

The Liturgy of the Faithful begins with a litany of intercession much as in the Byzantine liturgy. The diptychs* after the creed and the lavabo* are also in the form of litanies. Mary is commemorated thus: ‘For the memorial of Lady Mary the holy virgin who bare Christ our Lord and our Saviour.’ The 318 fathers of Nicaea are commemorated, and among the other fathers are mentioned both Theodore and Diodore as well as Nestorius, Flavian, Ambrose and Meletius. Emperor Constantine, his mother Helena, and later Byzantine emperors like Constans and Theodosius are also commemorated.

Even when the words of institution are missing, the epiclesis of the Holy Spirit upon the offering is given in full.

There is a second lavabo before the fraction* and consignation. The priest censes his hands after the lavabo before proceeding to the fraction. The Lord’s Prayer precedes the elevation and communion. The deacon who read the epistle is to administer the body from the paten and the deacon who gave the peace to administer the blood from the chalice.

The eucharist is called the Kudasha or sanctification: the liturgical language is Eastern Syriac, though the vernacular is used in most churches today. Leavened bread is used and communion is generally now in both kinds by intinction.

Offices

The canonical offices are mainly three: lelya (nocturns), sapra (matins) and ramsha (vespers) (see Canonical Hours).

Other liturgies

The baptismal liturgy is modelled on the eucharistic liturgy, with a pre-anaphora and anaphora for the consecration of the water with the chrism. Confirmation does not exist as a separate rite. Neither penance nor the sacrament of confession is used in this tradition. The anointing of the sick was also unknown until it was borrowed from the West in the sixteenth century. The marriage liturgy includes crowning and common drinking of wine from the same cup, but it is doubtful whether the East Syrians regarded marriage as a sacrament. The ordination practices are similar to those of other Eastern churches.

Notes

* The text of Addai and Mari is given in ET in F. E. Brightman and C. E. Hammond. Liturgies Eastern and Western, I, 1896. Pp. 247-305; G. P. Badger, The Nestorians and Their Rituals, 2 vols. 1852: H. W. Codrington, Studies of the Syrian Liturgies, 1952.

7

West Syrian Worship

Introduction

The West Syrian Church, known to many as “Jacobite” (after Jacob Baradeus, the 6th century reorganizer of the West Syrian Church) and as Monophysite (after the erroneous idea prevailing in Byzantium and the Latin West that the West Syrians believed only in the divine nature of Christ), historically inherited the Semitic, Palestinian tradition of Christianity, though not uninfluenced by the Hellenic milieu in which they lived.

The Syrian tradition broke up soon into four families - the East Syrian (Edessa), the West Syrian (Antioch), the Melchite (Greek), and the Maronite (Lebanon).

Liturgical rites

The West Syrian church has probably the richest and most diverse heritage in the matter of eucharistic anaphorae and canonical offices. In addition to these are the rites of baptism and Chrismation of which three different forms are known. Ordination rites also vary substantially; the whole liturgical corpus also includes rites of matrimony (separate rites for first and second marriages), burial (different for clergy, laymen, women and children), anointing of the sick (not extreme unction - again different for clergy and laity), profession of monks, consecration of churches and altars, translation of relics etc.

The Eucharistic Liturgy

The liturgy is now - a - days celebrated mostly in the vernacular _ Arabic in the Middle East, English in America, Malayalam in India and so on _ though certain portions may still be said by the priest in Syriac. The officiating priest and the people alternate in practically all the prayers, and the deacon plays an important part, admonishing and directing the people to stand with fear, pray and understand the nature of the event that is going on in the Liturgy. Choirs have not been allowed to usurp the place of the congregation as in certain other liturgies.

Some scholars have spoken of a hundred different west syrian anaphorae, though only about 70 can be traced by the present writer. Some of these, especially the principal anaphora of St. James goes back in its basic structure to the Jerusalem Church of Apostolic times. Other anaphorae come from the 2nd (Ignatius of Antioch) to the 14th centuries, if we take the names of the anaphorae at face value. New liturgies continued to be created in every century up to the 14th, though production was most prolific from the 4th to the 7th. The twelth century produced at least six new anaphorae and about the same number was produced by the 13th. With the 13th century the development reached its peak in Gregory Bar - Hebrews and has remained more or less static ever since.

Two peculiarities of the West Syrian rite are (a) the liturgy of Incense between the liturgy of the word and the liturgy of the Eucharist proper; and (b) the prayer of adieu to the altar at the end of the liturgy - The liturgy of incense which recalls the offering of incense in the Temple (Exodus 30:1-10) seems to have replaced the dismissal of the Catechumens, and comprises a general absolution of the priest and people before the offering of the Eucharistic sacrifice. It also represents a sort of offertory, for incense symbolizes the good works and prayers which are wellpleasing to God. It symbolizes also the prayers of the departed saints which mix with those of the congregation, as a true spiritual offering of praise and adoration.

The epiclesis occurs in all the 70 known liturgies, though the form of the epiclesis varies verbally from anaphora to anaphora, as also does the verbal content of the “words of institution.”

Not all the 70 anaphorae are in common use. The ones most commonly used in India are St. James (on all principal feasts, for the first Eucharist offered by a priest, or offered at a new altar), Dionysius Bar Salibhi, St. John Chrysostom and St. John the Evangelist.

The canonical offices for ordinary days is called the Schhims, and has recently been translated into English by the Benedictine Fr. Griffiths. The more elaborate office, the Fenqith, has not yet been translated into English or Malayalam and is rarely used even in the Syriac. The Syriac text of the Fenqith is available in our Indian edition as in a Moral edition (1886-1896).

One major feature of the Eucharistic liturgy and the daily offices is the Sedra, a long meditative - homiletical prayer, preceded by a pro - emion which seems to be an elaborated form of the Gloria. These prayers are rich in theological content, and play a considerable role in the religious education of the faithful, especially in the absence of biblical preaching.

An introduction and critical text of the Syriac anaphorae with latin translation have been published by the Pontifical Oriental Institute in Rome (Anaphorae Syriacae, 1953). The 9th century commentary of Moses Bar Kepha on the Syrian liturgies was published with an English translation by R. H. Connolly and H. W. Codrington (Two commentaries on the Jacobite Liturgy).

The people communicate rather rarely, the legal minimum of once per year being observed by most, usually on Holy Thursday. Communion is in both kinds, usually by intinction for the laity. The priest usually administers, though the deacon is allowed to serve communion to the laity.

Reservation of the sacrament for adoration is forbidden, it may be reserved in case of need for the sick, and for those who fast till the evening.

Confession before communion is often demanded, though this is not necessary for those who communicate frequently. Fasting from the previous midnight is required.

The lections during the liturgy of the word are three, one from the acts or Catholic epistles (representing the twelve), then from the Pauline epistles, and then finally the Gospel which is read with great ceremony by the officiating priest. Sermons had gone out of use, but are coming back more recently as priests become better trained.

The creed recited is the Niceno - Constantinopolitan, introduced into the liturgy by Peter the Fuller in the 5th century as an anti-chalcedonian measure.

Two of the west syrian anaphora lack the actual words of institution - Mathew the Shepherd and Sixtus of Rome. The latter says simply: “He, when he was prepared for his saving passion, by the bread which by him was blessed, broken and divided among his holy Apostles, gave us his propitiatory body for life eternal; in a like manner, also by the cup etc.”

The canon of the mass, with words of institution, ananesis and epitlesis is said aloud by the priest, with responses from the people.

Select Bibliography

1. Fortescue, A       The Lesser Eastern Churches, London, 1913.

2. de Vries, W.       Sakramententheologie bei den Syrischen Monophysiten, Rome 1940.

3. Ziade, I article on Syrienne (eglise) in Dictionnaire de Theologie Catholique, Paris 1914, vol. 14, pp. 3017- 3088.

8

THE ETHIOPIAN LITURGICAL TRADITION

The present liturgical corpus of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church is certainly the result of many centuries of varied development; the decisive shape was given to it, however, during the reforms under king Zara Yaekob, who ruled from 1434-1468. During his memorable reign many liturgical and theological books were translated into Ge’ez, the national language, from Coptic, Arabic, and possibly Syriac.

Ge’ez, also called Ethiopic, is still the official liturgical language, actually in use in practically all the Churches, except in a few city churches where, through the efforts of the Emperor, Amharic, the Modern Ethiopian language, has been introduced.

Liturgical Books

The main sources for Ethiopic worship are Sunodos (apostolic canons), Metshafe - Kidan (The Testament of our Lord), Didaskalia Feta Negest (nomocanon), Ser’at - we - tezaz (ordinances and instructions), Mets’hafe Bahr’i (The Book of nature), Te’ aqebe Mestir (Stewardship of the mystery). The 17th century liturgical revision resulted in four major liturgical books - Mets’hafe Qeddase (Missal), Mets’hafe Nuzaze (Manual of Penitence), Mets’hafe Taklil (Matrimony) and Mets’hafe Qandil (Manual of unction of the sick). The Missal has two parts, one containing 16 to 20 anaphorae (Qeddase) and another with the psalmody for the Eucharist (Zemmare), often chanted by choirs specially trained.

In addition there are four books for the canonical daily offices - (a) Deggwa, or the antiphonal chants for the whole liturgical year except Lent; (b) Tsomedeggwa contains the chants for Lent, but not for the Holy Week; (c) Mawaseet an alternate form, less frequently used, of the daily offices; and (d) Meeraf, the common order for the daily office.

One could also mention paraliturgical works produced in the monasteries like Wuddase Mariam (Praises of Mary) and Anqutse -Berhan (the Gate of Light).

Eucharistic Anaphorae

Twenty different anaphorae are known, under the names - (1) The Apostles (2) Our Lord Jesus Christ (3) Our Lady Mary (by Cyriacus or Qirqos) (4) St. Dioscurus (5) St. John Chrysostom (6) St. John the Evangelist (7) St. James the Brother of our Lord (8) The Hosanna - Liturgy of St. Gregory (9) The Christmas Liturgy of St. Gregory (10) The Anaphora of our Lady Mary by St. Gregory (11) Another Anaphora of our Lady by St. Gregory (12) The 318 Orthodox Fathers of Nicea (13) St. Basil (14) St. Athanasius (15) St. Epiphanius (16) The longer St. Cyril (17) The shorter St. Cyril (18) St. James of Sarug (19) St. Mark (20)Yet another anaphora of our Lady Mary. Marcos Dawud, the Egyptian layman who was the first director of the Theological School in Addis Ababa, published in 1954 an English version of the Preanaphora and 14 anaphora (apostles, our Lord, St. John the Evangelist, St. Mary, The 318 fathers, St. Athanasius, St. Basil, St. Gregory, St. Epiphanius, St. John Chrysostom, St. Cyril, St. James of Serugh, St. Dioscurus and St. Gregory II). The Ethiopic and Amharic texts of these also have been published. Many of the anaphorae indicate a Syrian origin, possibly in the syrian monastery of the Skete in Egypt. The liturgy of St. Mark is not videly used in the Coptic church of Egypt (Cyril, Gregory and Basil). There is no reason to believe therefore that the Ethiopian Church simply copied the Egyptian liturgical practice. Elements of Coptic, Syrian and Byzantine liturgical practices are seen in the Ethiopian tradition, but the latter has a personality of its own.

Structure of Eucharistic Liturgy

The Ethiopic Liturgy has two main parts (1) the pre-anaphora, common to all the anaphorae (2) the anaphora proper. The pre-anaphora,which is unusually long, consists of six Psalms (25, 61, 102, 103, 130, 131), prayers for the cleansing of the celebrants and the vessels, prayers of vesting, the pro-thesis of the elements (ending with Psalm 117), the Enarxis (the prayers of the oblation, the prayers of the “wrappings”, the prayers for absolution and a long litany of intercession), and then the liturgy of the Catechumens (Censing of the elements) prayers of intercession for the living and the departed, censing of the priests and people, the three lections from the Pauline Epistles, the Catholic epistles, and the Book of Acts, the Trisagion addressed to Christ and embellished with incarnational epithets; prayers of the gospel, the chanting of an antiphon from the psalms, the blessing of the four quarters of the world, the censing of the gospel, and then the reading of the Gospel and a sermon. The pre-anaphora concludes with a long litany of intercession for the Church and the Catechumens and the people, especially the poor, the dismissal of the Catechumens, a creed or confession of faith in the mystery of the Holy Trinity, in the full deity and humanity of Christ, in the goodness of all that is created, about the underfiled nature of marriage and childbirth, a repudiation of circumcision, etc., followed by the lavabo, the prayer of salutation and the kiss of peace.

The Ethiopic anaphorae vary considerably in structure. The basic structure is as follows:

1) Eucharistic thanks giving, parallel to the western canon up to the words of institution, 2) Prayers of intercession and conclusion of the thanks giving prayer, 3) Sanctus (which is missing in one or two anaphorae), 4) Institution Narrative (substituted by a prayer in the Anaphora of James of Sarugh), 5) Anamnesis, Epiclesis, (6) Fraction and commixture, (7) Our Father and continuation prayer, (8) Inclination of the head and prayer o